Friday, April 26, 2013

Food poisoning on rise in US, survey finds

A crackdown on slaughterhouses has helped cut rates of certain types of food poisoning, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported on Thursday. But other causes of stomach upset are on the rise – a trend that indicates better regulation of meat from hoof to plate is needed, as well as stricter regulation of produce and processed food, the CDC says.

One type of stomach bug called Campylobacter, carried in chicken and unpasteurized milk and cheese, is becoming more common, the CDC’s regular survey of foodborne illness finds.

Dr. Robert Tauxe, an expert in foodborne illness at CDC, says meat-related foodborne illnesses have plummeted since the agency started intensively studying trends in 1996. “When we look at what has changed between the 2006-2008 period and now, unfortunately nothing has gone down and a couple of infections have gone up,” Tauxe added in a telephone interview.
 
“Campylobacter has increased 14 percent since 2006-2008 and then there are the much less common Vibrio infections -- and those have increased 43 percent.” There were 193 reported cases of Vibrio infection in 2012, with six deaths.

Vibrio bacteria are in the same family as cholera, but in this case not nearly as dangerous. They thrive in warm sea water and mostly sicken people who eat raw oysters or who go into affected waters with an open cut, Tauxe says. “The warmer it is, the more Vibrios there are,” he said. “It grows a lot when the water is warm. It is a problem in the summer much more than in the winter.”



But by far the most common cause of food poisoning is Salmonella, the CDC found using its Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network or FOODNet, which collects data in 10 states. “Salmonella is in the number one spot, causing 40 percent of the infections that the FOODNet system collected,” Tauxe said. “Campylobacter was number two, pretty close behind at 35 percent.”

The FOODNet system documented 7,800 Salmonella infections in 2012, with 33 deaths. Nearly 7,000 people were diagnosed with Campylobacter infections, and six died. That’s just a small percentage of the actual cases – CDC estimates that about 48 million Americans, or one in six, get sick from eating contaminated food each year and 3,000 die.

“We figure that for every infection that is diagnosed, there are 25 or 30 more illnesses out there,” Tauxe said. “Maybe some of those people don’t see a doctor or maybe they do see a doctor but there isn’t a culture.”

New USDA regulations that require more intense testing of food animals probably caused Campylobacter infections to fall in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the CDC says. But not enough, Tauxe said.

“What I take away from this is we need to think more and more about what happens to the animals before they come to slaughter, what happens back on the farm and what happens with other foods such as produce and processed foods,” he said.

New Food and Drug Administration regulations regarding produce may help prevent other sources of illness, he added. They require facilities that manufacture, process, pack or hold human food to develop formal plans for preventing their products from causing foodborne illness.

The 2011 Food Safety Modernization Act was designed to help the FDA better able to prevent foodborne outbreaks, rather than simply reacting after one happens. FDA commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg asked Congress for $295.8 million this year to help implement the new regulations.
“The fresh produce is important. We have had a lot of Salmonella problems related to fresh produce,” Tauxe said. “Further attention to poultry parts and ground poultry like ground turkey may help, and the processed food industry – the people who make peanut butter and many other processed foods – I think there is room for improvement there.”

Many of the bugs that sicken people live naturally in the digestive systems of animals, including people. Outbreaks of disease have been linked to unclean slaughtering processes and unhygienic meat handling.

And it was thought that fresh produce, such as lettuce and cantelopes, were contaminated by manure. But there may be more to it than that, Tauxe says.

“There is reason to think that some Salmonella may be more at home than we think in plants,” he said. “They are not just passively on the plant. They may be inside the plant, which is a great place to be because you don’t get washed off and the next animal or person to eat the plant gets it.”
In January CDC released a report showing that produce accounted for 46 percent of foodborne illnesses between 1998 and 2008, while contaminated meat accounted for fewer illnesses but more deaths -- 29 percent of deaths in total.
 

Contaminated cucumbers sicken 73

At least 73 people in 18 states have been sickened with salmonella poisoning after eating cucumbers imported from Mexico, government health officials said Thursday.
 
The potentially tainted cukes have been removed from the market and the two firms involved -- Daniel Cardenas Izabal and Miracle Greenhouse of Culiacan, Mexico -- were placed on import alert Thursday, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The cucumbers were distributed by Tricar Sales Inc. of Rio Rico, Ariz.
 
Cucumbers from the firms will be denied access to the United States until the suppliers show that they are not contaminated with salmonella, including the salmonella Saintpaul strain detected in the current outbreak.
 
The biggest concentrations of victims were clustered in Western states, including 28 from California and nine from Arizona. Fourteen people have been hospitalized. Reports show that illnesses occurred between Jan. 12 and April 6, though more could still be detected.
 
Most people infected with salmonella bacteria develop diarrhea, fever and abdominal cramps within one to three days of eating contaminated food. The illness typically lasts four to seven days, and most people recover without treatment. However, some people may require hospitalization. Most at risk are children younger than 5, older adults and people with weakened immune systems.

Friday, April 12, 2013

Trader Joe’s seeks to conceal added sugars with term ‘evaporated cane juice’, says lawsuit

By Elaine WATSON , 01-Apr-2013

A lawsuit filed by Pratt & Associates LLP - which sued Chobani on similar grounds last year - says Trader Joe’s uses the term ‘evaporated cane juice’ instead of the more accurate terms ‘dried sugar cane syrup’ or ‘sugar’ on several private label products from Greek-style yogurt to soy milk, despite the fact that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has repeatedly told firms not to use it.
The complaint, filed on behalf of California residents Amy Gitson, Christine Vodicka and Deboraa Ross on March 25 in a federal court in California, says the FDA has sent out multiple warning letters and produced draft guidance specifically telling food manufacturers not to use the term ‘evaporated cane juice’ because it is “false and misleading” and is not in fact a juice.

The plaintiffs were misled by the defendant’s use of the term ‘milk’ in connection with its soy beverages

Additionally, evaporated cane juice is not on the list of nutritive carbohydrate sweeteners permitted for use in yogurt under the FDA’s standard of identity for yogurt, allege Gitson et al

They also allege that Trader Joe’s falsely describes products as having ‘no added coloring or preservatives’ when in fact several, “including French Village Strawberry non-fat yogurt, have artificial coloring and a number… including chocolate peanut butter salted caramel truffles, have added chemical preservatives”.

Evaporated cane juice is dried syrup from cane sugar
 
Finally, Trader Joe’s also misleads shoppers by representing non-dairy calcium products as ‘milk’, they argue.

The plaintiffs were misled by the defendant’s use of the term ‘milk’ in connection with its soy beverages [Trader Joe’s organic chocolate soy milk]. Defendant’s actions illegal mislead the public by inappropriately employing names and terms reserved by law for standardized dairy products.”

In truth, evaporated cane juice is little different than added white sugar
The language in the complaint echoes that in a lawsuit filed against Greek yogurt giant Chobani by Californian plaintiff Katie Kane last year, which notes that: “In truth, evaporated cane juice is little different than added white sugar. White sugar and evaporated cane juice both have 111 calories per ounce.

“Both types of sugar come from the same cane crop, and are about 99% sucrose.”

Chobani: To any reasonable consumer, the word 'cane' in the ingredient list indicates a sweetener ingredient

In a motion to dismiss Kane's lawsuit filed in November 2012, Chobani said that the FDA's 2009 guidance advising firms not to use the term evaporated cane juice is "a draft" and "non-binding" from a legal perspective.

Meanwhile, it "is not plausible that a reasonable consumer would be deceived" by the term evaporated cane juice added Chobani, which said that in any case, the plaintiff's state law claims are preempted by federal labeling laws. 
 
It added: "Plaintiffs cannot plausibly claim that they were unaware that 'evaporated cane juice' is a sweetener.

"To any reasonable consumer (and especially a consumer with the apparent concerns over the source of sugars these plaintiffs allegedly had), the word 'cane' in the ingredient list indicates a sweetener ingredient. This is particularly true for plaintiffs who allege that they knew 'dried cane syrup' was a sweetener ingredient and, therefore, cannot plead ignorance about evaporated cane juice."

Chobani: Evaporated cane juice is permitted in yogurt

As for the issue of whether evaporated cane juice is a permitted sweetener in yogurt, Chobani said the "FDA has proposed a new standard of identity for yogurt that allows any 'safe and suitable sweetening ingredients'. (74 F.R. 2443, 2455: Jan. 15, 2009). Evaporated cane juice is unquestionably a 'safe and suitable sweetening ingredient'.

"Significantly, the FDA has also suggested that it will not enforce violations of the current standard of identity (relied on by plaintiffs) if companies comply with the proposed one (in which evaporated cane juice is unquestionable permitted)."

Trader Joe’s - which is based in California and has 370 stores nationwide - said it did not wish to comment on the lawsuit (Gitson v. Trader Joe’s Co., No. 13-1333 (U.S. District Court, Northern District, California, San Francisco Division).
A spokeswoman said: "Trader Joe's does not comment on pending litigation."

Friday, December 21, 2012

Deal reached to reopen NM peanut butter plant

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — A troubled New Mexico peanut butter plant that had its licensed yanked after being linked to a widespread salmonella outbreak reached a deal Friday to resume some operations the day after Christmas under the watchful eye of federal regulators.
 
A consent decree filed in federal court says Sunland Inc., the nation's largest organic peanut butter producer, can reopen if it hires an independent expert to develop a sanitation plan, which then must be approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

Conditions at the plant prompted the FDA in November to for the first time use new authority to revoke the company's operating certificate without a court hearing. The action came after the plant was linked to a salmonella outbreak that sickened 42 people in 20 states this fall.

Friday's filing reinstates Sunland's food facility registration. But the company cannot process or distribute food from its peanut butter or peanut mill plants in Portales until it has complied with the consent decree's requirements and receives written authorization from the FDA.

"This consent decree prohibits Sunland from selling processed foods to consumers until it fully complies with the law," Stuart F. Delery, principal deputy assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's Civil Division said in a statement. "As this case demonstrates, the Department of Justice and FDA will work together to protect the health and safety of Americans by making sure that those who produce and sell the food we eat follow the law."

Sunland said the agreement came after it "provided additional information to FDA to demonstrate that recommended actions have been taken and required corrective actions are being implemented."
Sunland spokeswoman Katalin Coburn said that after the decree was filed, the FDA gave the plant permission to reopen its peanut processing facility while it works on the plan for reopening the peanut butter plant. She said work will resume the day after Christmas.

The Sunland plant was shuttered and hundreds of its products recalled in September and October after the salmonella outbreak was linked to Trader Joe's Valencia peanut butter manufactured at Sunland.

The recall and plant shuttering came as the region was finishing a bumper harvest of the prized Valencia peanuts grown almost exclusively in the region. Because of their sweet flavor, they are favored for organic and natural peanut butter products because they require few additives.
Sunland produces products for a number of national grocery and retail chains, and New Mexico Peanut Growers Association President Wayne Baker says the industry generates about $60 million in the region each year.

The FDA took the unusual step in November of revoking the facilities registration just as the plant was hoping to reopen its processing plant to begin work on the millions of pounds of Valencia peanuts piled up in barns after this year's harvest.

The action was denounced as unfair and unnecessarily heavy-handed by many in the conservative farm town of Portales, where Sunland is the largest private employer. At the end of November, the plant had laid off about 30 percent of its 150 workers.

The FDA said inspectors found samples of salmonella in 28 different locations in the plant, in 13 nut butter samples and in one sample of raw peanuts. Inspectors found improper handling of the products, unclean equipment and uncovered trailers of peanuts outside the facility that were exposed to rain and birds. Inspectors also said employees lacked access to hand-washing sinks, and dirty hands had direct contact with ready-to-package peanuts.

The FDA said it inspected the plant at least four times over the past five years, each time finding violations. Michael Taylor, the FDA's deputy commissioner for foods, said the agency's inspections after the outbreak found even worse problems than what had been seen there before.
Plant officials have said they were never notified of past violations.

Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick in Washington contributed to this report.
 

FDA closer to approving biotech salmon

By Carey Gillam
A controversial genetically engineered salmon has moved a step closer to the consumer's dining table after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said Friday the fish didn't appear likely to pose a threat to the environment or to humans who eat it.

AquAdvantage salmon eggs would produce fish with the potential to grow to market size in half the time of conventional salmon. If it gets a final go-ahead, it would be the first food from a transgenic animal - one whose genome has been altered - to be approved by the FDA.

The AquAdvantage Atlantic salmon egg was developed by AquaBounty Technology to speed up production to meet global seafood demand.

In a draft environmental assessment, the FDA affirmed earlier findings that the biotech salmon was not likely to be harmful. It said it would take comments from the public on its report for 60 days before making a final decision on approval.

"With respect to food safety, FDA has concluded that food from AquAdvantage salmon is as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon, and that there is a reasonable certainty of no harm from consumption," the FDA assessment states.

AquaBounty officials said they were caught by surprise by the news that its product was a step closer to approval as years of controversy had followed the company's application for a go-ahead from the regulator. They said they did not know the timing or details of the process the FDA will follow following the 60-day comment period.

"We are encouraged that the environmental assessment is being released and hope the government continues the science-based regulatory process," said AquaBounty Chief Executive Ronald Stotish.
Critics say the new salmon is a "dangerous experiment" and have pressured the FDA to reject it. They say the FDA has relied on outdated science and substandard methods for assessing the new fish.
 
"We are deeply concerned that the potential of these fish to cause allergic reactions has not been adequately researched," said Michael Hansen, a scientist at the Consumers Union. "FDA has allowed this fish to move forward based on tests of allergenicity of only six engineered fish, tests that actually did show an increase in allergy-causing potential."

There were also concerns the FDA would not require the genetically modified salmon to be labeled as such, and some critics said they may file a lawsuit to prevent what they fear could be the imminent approval of the engineered fish.

"Congress can still keep FDA from unleashing this dangerous experiment," said Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch, a consumer advocacy group. "Although this latest FDA decision is a blow to consumer confidence, we encourage everyone to contact their members of Congress and demand this reckless decision be overturned."

The Center for Food Safety, another non-profit consumer protection group, was highly critical of the FDA report, and officials said they might sue the regulator over the issue.

"It is extremely disappointing that the Obama Administration continues to push approval of this dangerous and unnecessary product," said Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety. "The GE salmon has no socially redeeming value. It's bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment."

FDA spokeswoman Morgan Liscinsky said no final decisions have been made on labeling or on the application for approval.

Tuesday, July 31, 2012




FDA data dump shows few toxins in jerky treats; complaints rise to 1,800

Newly posted results of more than five years of testing chicken jerky pet treats made in China appear to confirm assertions from government officials that they don’t know what’s making America’s dogs sick, even as complaints about the products have nearly doubled.

Federal Food and Drug Administration officials unexpectedly posted summaries this week of lab results of nearly 300 jerky treat samples collected and tested in the U.S. between April 2007 and June 2012. 

The documents indicate that FDA scientists at labs nationwide tested for bacterial contamination, for mold and for chemicals used in antifreeze, resins and plastics that can harm pets. They tested for heavy metals and for the melamine and melamine analogs detected in pet food that sickened thousands of animals in 2007.
At the same time, new FDA figures indicate that the number of complaints of animal illnesses and deaths blamed on the treats has risen to more than 1,800, according to Tamara Ward, an agency spokeswoman.

The lab results show a mere handful of adverse findings related to the popular Chinese-made treats. None of the reports rose to the level of needing regulatory action, such as a recall, the documents indicate.


“This does not represent ALL testing that has and is being conducted by FDA,” Ward said in an email. “Additional testing is currently being conducted through other avenues.”

The FDA released the data a day after NBCNews.com reported that the agency had refused to release results of February inspections of the Chinese plants that make the treats. The agency said releasing the information would violate rules protecting trade secrets and confidential commercial information and that it would interfere with enforcement proceedings. That data remains confidential.

Pet advocates critical of the FDA said that while they welcome the release of the domestic data, the results indicate that the agency is not looking hard enough for the source of the illnesses, including hundreds of reports of vomiting, diarrhea and kidney failure.

“When I scanned down through the list of testing, they all seemed to be centered around the same handful of tests,” said Susan Thixton, who writes the blog TruthaboutPetFood.com. She believes the FDA needs to broaden its view to include other potential toxins.

"You can't find what you don't look for," she said.

FDA covered bases, experts say

But animal health experts not affiliated with the FDA said the agency appears to be using due diligence to track the source of the problem. Tina Wismer, medical director of the ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, said the review appears to be complete.

“Looking at what they’re testing for, I’m looking at the list of poisons that we know affect the kidneys and they’ve got their bases covered,” she said.

That’s a view echoed by Marion Ehrich, a professor of pharmacology and toxicology at the Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine.

“From the website provided, it seems analyses of submitted samples have not yet led to the discovery of anything toxic that is consistently present in the samples,” she wrote in an email. “They have been looking at possible suspects (melamine, bacteria, molds, etc.) but nothing is standing out.”
The FDA is working to develop and validate new ways to detect toxic substances for which there are no current tests, said Ward, the agency spokeswoman.

The 284 samples included in the new data were collected after consumer complaints, as part of routine surveillance or as an assignment, Ward said. Of those, only six indicated adverse findings.
Those included salmonella found in three samples, including Dingo and Waggin Train chicken jerky products and in one unidentified product.

Mold was found in a sample of Waggin’ Train jerky, too. Low levels of melamine were detected in one sample of Del Monte beef flavor jerky treats, the tests showed. Another Dingo treat had a questionable genetic fingerprint that was sent for further analysis.

In addition, a few samples were positive for undeclared propylene glycol, but not at levels that would have prompted regulatory actions, the documents said.

Most of the tests were like one posted on Aug. 20, 2007 for Waggin’ Train chicken jerky tenders. No melamine or related compounds including ammeline, ammelide or cyanuric acid was found, the test showed. No ethylene glycol or diethylene glycol -- toxic components of antifreeze -- were found.

The FDA has issued three warnings about jerky treats since 2007, including the most recent one last November. That’s a fairly strong action for an agency that typically keeps mum on investigations, said Kimberly May, a veterinarian and assistant director in the communications division for the American Veterinary Medical Association.

“This is as close as they’re going to come to saying there’s a problem,” May said. Officials with Nestle Purina Pet Care Co. and Del Monte Foods, which make the top brands of treats, insist that their products continue to be safe to feed animals as directed on the packages.

But some experts say it’s up to pet owners to be cautious. 

“At this point in time, until we figure out exactly what is going on, I probably wouldn’t feed these,” the ASPCA's Wismer said.

To report complaints about animal illness, visit the FDA’s Safety Reporting Portal.
 

33 sick in 7 states from salmonella in beef

At least 33 people are sick, including 11 hospitalized, from salmonella-tainted ground beef linked to nearly 30,000 pounds of recalled hamburger on Sunday.

People in seven states have been infected with salmonella Enteritidis linked to beef produced by Cargill Meat Solutions of Wyalusing, Pa., officials with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Monday.
The 85-percent lean ground beef was produced on May 25.

Ill people include 14 in New York, 10 in Vermont, three in Massachusetts, two in Virginia and New Hampshire and one in Maine, the CDC said.

Illnesses began in early June. Those that occurred after June 29 might not yet be reported because of the lag in time between when illness occurs and when it’s documented.
 
Cargill officials recalled 29,339 pounds of meat, packaged in 14-pound chubs, after the outbreak was detected. Federal officials with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service linked the beef to five infected patients.

Consumers should check their freezers for recalled products and discard them. The recalled meat bears the establishment number “EST.9400” inside the USDA mark of inspection.

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Complex global network makes food poisoning outbreaks hard to track

June 1, 2012


Medical Daily


http://www.medicaldaily.com/news/20120601/10125/food-poisoning-outbreak-complex-trade-network.htm


Salmonella, E. coli and other food-related diseases outbreaks can sicken and kill with sweeping effectiveness. Getting to the root of these outbreaks is a difficult task made even harder by global trade.


The ingredients in your favorite dish may have begun the journey to your plate from dozens of diverse countries across the globe. The diverse and complex food traffic network makes your meal delicious but can also cause headaches when a food-related disease outbreak occurs.


The new study, led by Jozsef Baranyi, PhD, from the Institute of Food Research at Norwich Research Park, highlights the vast web of food commerce as the culprit behind the difficulty in identifying which food is the cause for a poisoning outbreak.


A recent salmonella outbreak in America was found to have originated from a mail-order hatchery in Ohio. While investigators were able to get to the source of the food poisoning outbreak rather quickly, 93 people across 23 states were sickened by the tainted food.

In 2011, an E. coli outbreak in northern Germany caused 45 deaths and 3,785 were sickened by the disease beginning on May 2. Around three weeks after the first reports of the E. coli outbreak, cucumbers from Spain were deemed to be the culprit and were quickly pulled from the shelves. The source of the cucumbers, two greenhouses located in Andalusia, was found to have no traces of E. coli contamination. Cross-contamination could have occurred while the cucumbers made their way into Germany but the vegetables were soon ruled out as the cause of the E. coli outbreak. It was not until June 5, 2011 that local bean sprouts were found to be the source of the E. coli outbreak.


The new study highlights how any delay in identifying the source of the contamination can lead to greater numbers of individuals affected while governments and companies can also be negatively affected by the inability to pinpoint the outbreak's source. Researchers collected import and export data from the United Nations to reconstruct the global food traffic network.


The study shows that even small countries, like the Netherlands, could be a hot spot for contamination. The Netherlands had around $129 billion in total import and export for 2008 and is a crucial hub for trade. That means that tracking a possible outbreak in The Netherlands, or other countries that The Netherlands trades with, would be incredibly difficult because of how much food enters and leaves the Netherlands each year.


Because of globalization, food outbreaks may occur more often than before. To help reduce the effects of possible food outbreaks in the future, some have called for ways to monitor food trade or for companies and governments to collect and share information. This would not only help limit the damage of a food poisoning outbreak but may also help reduce food waste, leading to better food distribution.


The study was published in PLoS ONE.



Complex global network makes food poisoning outbreaks hard to track


June 1, 2012
Medical Daily


http://www.medicaldaily.com/news/20120601/10125/food-poisoning-outbreak-complex-trade-network.htm

Salmonella, E. coli and other food-related diseases outbreaks can sicken and kill with sweeping effectiveness. Getting to the root of these outbreaks is a difficult task made even harder by global trade.


The ingredients in your favorite dish may have begun the journey to your plate from dozens of diverse countries across the globe. The diverse and complex food traffic network makes your meal delicious but can also cause headaches when a food-related disease outbreak occurs.


The new study, led by Jozsef Baranyi, PhD, from the Institute of Food Research at Norwich Research Park, highlights the vast web of food commerce as the culprit behind the difficulty in identifying which food is the cause for a poisoning outbreak.


A recent salmonella outbreak in America was found to have originated from a mail-order hatchery in Ohio. While investigators were able to get to the source of the food poisoning outbreak rather quickly, 93 people across 23 states were sickened by the tainted food.


In 2011, an E. coli outbreak in northern Germany caused 45 deaths and 3,785 were sickened by the disease beginning on May 2. Around three weeks after the first reports of the E. coli outbreak, cucumbers from Spain were deemed to be the culprit and were quickly pulled from the shelves. The source of the cucumbers, two greenhouses located in Andalusia, was found to have no traces of E. coli contamination. Cross-contamination could have occurred while the cucumbers made their way into Germany but the vegetables were soon ruled out as the cause of the E. coli outbreak. It was not until June 5, 2011 that local bean sprouts were found to be the source of the E. coli outbreak.


The new study highlights how any delay in identifying the source of the contamination can lead to greater numbers of individuals affected while governments and companies can also be negatively affected by the inability to pinpoint the outbreak's source. Researchers collected import and export data from the United Nations to reconstruct the global food traffic network.


The study shows that even small countries, like the Netherlands, could be a hot spot for contamination. The Netherlands had around $129 billion in total import and export for 2008 and is a crucial hub for trade. That means that tracking a possible outbreak in The Netherlands, or other countries that The Netherlands trades with, would be incredibly difficult because of how much food enters and leaves the Netherlands each year.


Because of globalization, food outbreaks may occur more often than before. To help reduce the effects of possible food outbreaks in the future, some have called for ways to monitor food trade or for companies and governments to collect and share information. This would not only help limit the damage of a food poisoning outbreak but may also help reduce food waste, leading to better food distribution.


The study was published in PLoS ONE.


HAWAII Firm recalls ready-to-eat pork product for possible Listeria contamination

June 2, 2012
FSIS (Food Safety Inspection Service)


http://www.fsis.usda.gov/News_&_Events/Recall_037_2012_Release/index.asp


WASHINGTON -- Keoki's Lau Lau, a Honolulu, HI establishment, is recalling approximately 400 pounds of a ready-to-eat pork product due to possible contamination withListeria monocytogenes, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced today.


The following product is subject to recall:


12 oz. tubs of "Keoki's Kalua Brand Pork"


48 oz. tubs of "Keoki's Kalua Brand Pork"


The product bears the establishment number "EST. 12429" inside the USDA mark of inspection and batch numbers 546 and 552. The products were produced on May 24 and 25, 2012, and distributed to retail establishments in Hawaii.


The problem was discovered by the firm during follow-up testing conducted after a positive result from a FSIS routine monitoring sample. FSIS and the company have not received any reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of the products. Anyone concerned about a reaction should contact a healthcare provider.


Consumers seeking more information about this recall should contact Jamie Kema, Office Manager, at (808) 832-4231. Members of the media should contact Gary Ishimoto, President, at (808) 832-4224.

Friday, April 27, 2012

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - MAY 10:  People line u...

KFC Looses Suit

Monika Samaan was seven when she suffered salmonella encephalopathy




Wed, Apr 18, 2012


Fast food giant Kentucky Fried Chicken has been ordered to pay Aus$8 million (US$8.3 million) to an Australian girl who suffered severe brain damage and was paralysed after eating a Twister wrap.


-- a brain injury linked to food poisoning that also left her with a blood infection and septic shock -- in October 2005.


Several other family members also fell ill and they claimed Samaan's injuries, which include severe cognitive, motor and speech impairment and spastic quadriplegia, were caused by a chicken Twister wrap from a Sydney KFC outlet.


The New South Wales Supreme Court ruled in the family's favour a week ago and on Friday ordered KFC to pay the girl Aus$8 million in damages plus legal costs.


In a statement, the family's lawyer George Vlahakis said they were relieved the battle was over.


"Monika's severe brain damage and severe disability has already exhausted the very limited resources of the family," he said.


"Monika is now a big girl and they are finding it increasingly difficult to lift her and to look after her basic needs as well as look after Monika's younger siblings.


"The compensation ordered is very much needed. KFC have to date been determined that Monika does not receive a cent."


Last week KFC indicated it will appeal the decision but is yet to do so.


During the trial, Justice Stephen Rothman said the chicken became contaminated "because of the failure of one or more employees of KFC" to follow proper preparation


.© 2012 AFP


Copyright © 2012 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved



Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Tuna linked to salmonella outbreak in 20 states

By WILL LESTER

updated 4/17/2012 10:38:36 AM ET 2012-04-17T14:38:36


A yellowfin tuna product used to make dishes like sushi and sashimi sold at restaurants and grocery stores has been linked with an outbreak of salmonella that has sickened more than 100 people in 20 states and the District of Columbia, federal health authorities said Friday.
The Food and Drug Administration said 116 illnesses have been reported, including 12 people who have been hospitalized. No deaths have been reported.

Moon Marine USA Corp. of Cupertino, Calif., also known as MMI, is voluntarily recalling 58,828 pounds of frozen raw yellowfin tuna. It was labeled as Nakaochi Scrape AA or AAA when it was sold to grocery stores and restaurants and is scraped off the fish bones and looks like a ground product.
The product is not available for sale to individual consumers but may have been used to make sushi, sashimi, ceviche and similar dishes available in restaurants and grocery stores. Many of the people who became ill reported eating raw tuna in sushi as "spicy tuna," the FDA said.

Reports of the foodborne illness caused by salmonella bareilly have mainly come from the Eastern Seaboard and South, though cases have been reported as far west as Missouri and Texas.


As of Friday, illness had been reported these states and the District of Columbia: Alabama (2), Arkansas (1), Connecticut (5), District of Columbia (2), Florida (1), As Georgia (5), Illinois (10), Louisiana (2), Maryland (11), Massachusetts (8), Mississippi (1), Missouri (2), New Jersey (7), New York (24), North Carolina (2), Pennsylvania (5), Rhode Island (5), South Carolina (3), Texas (3), Virginia (5), and Wisconsin (12).


The memo notes there is likely a 30-day lag time between when people become sick and when cases are reported to health officials.


The raw yellowfin tuna product may have passed through several distributors before reaching the restaurant and grocery market and may not be clearly labeled.


Previous outbreaks of salmonella bareilly have been linked to bean sprouts, which are grown in warm, damp conditions.

The most common symptoms of salmonella are diarrhea, abdominal cramps and fever within eight to 72 hours of eating the contaminated food. The illness can be severe or even life-threatening for infants, older people, pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems.

The FDA recommended that people be cautious about eating raw seafood, inquire about the source and "when in doubt, don't eat it."


© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Monday, April 2, 2012

'Pink slime' forces beef processor into bankruptcy



AFA Foods says it will have to sell assets, blames negative media coverage

updated 4/2/2012 10:58:11 AM ET 2012-04-02T14:58:11


Ground beef processor AFA Foods filed for bankruptcy protection on Monday and said it plans to sell some or all of its assets, citing the impact of media coverage related to a meat filler critics have dubbed "pink slime."


Meat processors have faced a backlash over the use of an ammonia-treated beef filler they call "finely textured beef." Food activists have campaigned to have it banned arguing the product was unappetizing, but supporters say the product is safe to eat.


AFA is one of the largest ground beef processors in the United States and produces more than 500 million pounds of ground beef products annually, the company said in documents filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware.


The company sells its retail products, which include frozen hamburgers, ready ground beef and beef skillet mix, under the brand names "Moran's" and "Miller Quality Meats."


The media backlash over "pink slime" has prompted companies such as Beef Products Inc (BPI) to halt production at some of its plants and has led some big U.S. supermarket operators, including Safeway Inc and Supervalu Inc, to say they will stop buying the ammonia-treated beef.


The phrase "pink slime" was first used by a former USDA microbiologist, Gerald Zirnstein, who used the term in a 2002 email to co-workers after having toured a BPI plant. The current debate began after celebrity chef Jamie Oliver drew attention to the product.


AFA, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, has plants in California, Georgia, New York, Pennsylvania and Texas. It has about 850 full-time employees. As of December 2011, it posted annual revenue of $958 million.
The company said in court papers it has $219 million in assets and $197 million in liabilities. AFA also said it has secured a commitment for $56 million in debtor-in-possession financing from its lenders GE Capital and Bank of America.


"An orderly sale through Chapter 11 will unlock value and provide a smooth transition for employees, customers and other business partners," Ronald Allen, interim chief executive of AFA Foods, said in a statement.
The case is In re: AFA Foods Inc, U.S. bankruptcy court, District of Delaware, No: 12-11128


Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters

Thursday, December 29, 2011

8 Places Germs Hide in Your Home


By Dr. Charles “Chuck” Gerba” University of Arizona


1. Kitchen Sponges


Microwave the sponge. Your kitchen sponge is the germiest thing in your house. When researchers at the USDA tested common methods of disinfecting sponges—soaking them in bleach or lemon juice, microwaving, or washing in the dishwasher—they found that microwaving for one minute zapped the most germs, followed by a trip through the dishwasher. Every evening, after the last dishes are cleaned, zap the sponge.



2. Kitchen Sink


Scrub the Sink. After the sponge, the kitchen sink is the second most germ-laden place in your house (even worse than the toilet). Keep a spray bottle of cleaner handy, and spritz the sink after each use; then wipe and rinse with hot water.



3. Cutting Board


Scrub Your Cutting Board. There are 200 times more fecal bacteria on the average home cutting board than on the toilet seat, according to research by Charles Gerba, a microbiologist at the University of Arizona, and a nationally known expert on household germs. To get it clean, run it through the dishwasher; spray it with straight 5 percent vinegar, and let it set overnight; microwave it on high for 30 seconds; or swab it with alcohol.



4. Toothbrush


Protect Your Toothbrush. Store it at the opposite end of the bathroom from the toilet, in an upright position, so the water drains away from the bristles. Never store a wet toothbrush in a closed case. And don’t let the bristles of family members’ brushes touch. Still worried about germs? Consider a dunk in antimicrobial mouthwash. Studies show that a soak can eliminate germs. Don’t reuse the disinfecting liquid or soak more than one brush in it. Finally, if you’ve been sick, replace your toothbrush after you recover so you don’t re-infect yourself.


5. Washing Machine


Wash Laundry Right. Yes, even laundry can make you sick. “If you do undergarments in one load and handkerchiefs in the next, you’re blowing your nose in what was in your underwear,” Dr. Gerba notes. Make your underwear the last load, and at least once a month, run a hot cycle with vinegar to clear out germs in the machine. Also be sure to move washed laundry to the dryer as quickly as possible. Germs that survive the wash can start flourishing quickly.

6. Shower Curtain


Wipe Down Curtain After Showering. They get wet most every day, and they often stay wet, making them a perfect habitat for mold.



7. Indoor Garbage Can


Scrub Your Can. Particularly those in the kitchen and bathroom. Emptying them isn’t cleaning them. Regularly scrub them to make sure germs aren’t germinating.



8. Dishwashers


Watch for Mold. Take a close look at the edges of the door on your dishwasher. Many are breeding grounds for mold and mildew. The same goes for the rubber cushioning that surrounds most refrigerator doors.

Bonus added by Arizona Food Safety: Your telephones are germ magnets. Wipe your handsets daily and ensure all the ear wax is removed from the earpiece. Cell phone...do the same.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

A ball of chocolate chip cookie dough ready fo...Raw Cookie Dough Linked to E. Coli Outbreak



By Mikaela Conley
ABC News Blogs – Fri, Dec 9, 2011 9:02 PM EST

 
Licking the spoon for a couple tastes of raw cookie dough is an added bonus to the baking process, especially at holiday time, but the risk of falling ill from the batter might be greater than once thought.


New research published in the journal Clinical Infectious Disease found that the culprit of a 2009 multi-state E. coli outbreak was none other than the ready-to-bake prepackaged cookie dough found in most grocery stores. At the time of the outbreak, 77 people from 30 states became ill from the bad batter. About half of those people got so sick they had to be hospitalized.


After a thorough investigation, researchers at the Centers for Disease Control still have yet to fully pinpoint the ingredient in the cookie dough that caused the outbreak, but CDC study author Dr. Karen Neil said researchers believe the problem was in the flour. Raw flour does not go through the same rigorous process to kill pathogens the way in which eggs, molasses and sugar do in commercial products.
"You should not consume raw cookie dough or any other raw product that's intended to be baked or cooked, and food should always be prepared according to the recipe or instructions," Neil told ABCNews.com.


Because eating raw cookie dough is such a popular pastime (during the investigation, several people noted that they bought the uncooked batter with the intention to eat it as is), CDC researchers recommended manufacturers make the product safer as a ready-to-eat product. They also noted that more consumer education should be available about the risks of eating raw products such as cookie dough.


But Dr. William Schaffner, chairman of the department of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, said characterizing eating cookie dough as a risky behavior might be a bit of a stretch. It's similar to eating a hamburger or steak rare or medium rare, he said.


"Eating cookie dough is part of growing up," Schaffner said. "We know people are going to do it. It's too delicious. It's too much of a habit. To ask people not to do it is like whistling in a graveyard."
Nevertheless, Schaffner did note that commercial cookie dough companies should heed the CDC's advice by making sure its raw products are safe to consume as is.


"In the modern world, we have the potential to distribute a tainted product to a lot of people, so manufacturers should process the materials safely and expect that it could be eaten raw," Schaffner said.


As you bake up a storm this holiday season, Neil recommended to visit www.foodsafety.gov to learn about the best ways to handle raw and uncooked foods to keep you and your family safe and healthy.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Elizabeth Vargas and Bob Woodruff, co-anchors ...McDonald's Dumps McMuffin Egg Factory  Over Health Concerns



By CYNTHIA GALLI, ANGELA HILL and RYM MOMTAZ
Good Morning America – Fri, Nov 18, 2011 9:20 AM EST


McDonald's will be looking for a new source of eggs for many of its hugely popular Egg McMuffins.


The fast food company says it "will no longer accept" eggs from one of the country's biggest egg companies, Sparboe Farms, that is the subject of an ABC News investigation to be broadcast Friday on "20/20" and "World News with Diane Sawyer" and was cited Thursday by the Food and Drug Administration for "significant…and serious violations" in the production of eggs.


In one of the most forceful enforcement actions since last year's salmonella egg outbreak, the FDA issued a company-wide warning letter to Sparboe Farms, the country's fifth largest egg producer.


Citing "serious" and "significant violations" at five different locations, the FDA cited at least 13 violations of the recently enacted federal egg rule meant to prevent dangerous salmonella outbreaks.

"This is a warning that there is a systemic problem, not just at one barn or one location," said former FDA food safety chief David Acheson, now an industry consultant.
The ABC News broadcast will include undercover video taken over the summer inside Sparboe facilities in three states by an animal rights group, Mercy for Animals, that appears to show unsanitary conditions and repeated acts of animal cruelty.

Until today, the Sparboe facility in Vincent, Iowa, had produced all eggs used by McDonald's restaurants west of the Mississippi River.
In its statement, McDonald's said its decision was based on concerns about "the management of Sparboe facilities."


"McDonald's expects all of our suppliers to meet our stringent requirements for delivering high quality food prepared in a humane and responsible manner," the company said in a statement released to ABC News overnight.

The Mercy for Animals activist who went undercover to record the video inside Sparboe told ABC News chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross, "I saw workers do horrendous things to birds, they were thrown, grabbed by the neck, they're slammed in and out of cages."


Nathan Runkle, the executive director of Mercy for Animals, said the video shows how health hazards can be linked to large scale, low-cost egg producers, so-called "factory farms."


"They're the model of efficiency but they place an emphasis on profit over animal welfare," said Runkle, who says he and his members eat no animal products because of the animal cruelty they have seen.


Sparboe executives told Ross the employees seen on the tape abusing the chickens were all fired.


"We have a zero tolerance policy," said Ken Klippen, Sparboe's director of government relations. "People who violate that policy, we take that very seriously."

On a one-hour guided tour of the Sparboe facility in Vincent, Iowa, the source of all McDonald's eggs for restaurants west of the Mississippi, Klippen told Ross the Sparboe's facilities are "state of the art.

Sparboe has never had a single egg or chicken detected with salmonella, said Klippen, who added "there was no cause for any enforcement action.".
The 2010 salmonella outbreak affected more than 1,900 people and was traced to a different Iowa egg producer, Wright County Eggs.
More than a half-billion eggs had to be destroyed and the episode produced a nationwide health scare over the safety of eggs.
Salmonella in eggs is easily killed when both the white and the yolk are cooked thoroughly enough to be hard.


Many of those sickened last year ate custard at a California catering hall that had eggs from Wright County Eggs.


Federal authorities promised stepped up inspections and enforcement, and FDA officials said this week's action against Sparboe Farms was part of that effort.


McDonald's says its customers should have no health concerns because all of it eggs are thoroughly cooked before being sold.


"This is not a food safety issue for our menu items," McDonald's said in its statement. "We can assure our customers that eggs in our entire supply chain meet McDonald's high standards for quality and safety."


As to the allegations of animal cruelty, a spokesperson said the behavior seen on videos provided by 20/20 was "disturbing and completely unacceptable."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Consumer ReportsImage via Wikipedia'Consumer Reports': People 'ripped off when they buy fish'


By Bruce Horovitz, USA TODAY
Updated 2h 5m ago


About 18% of the fish sampled didn't match the names on placards, labels and menus, according to a study by 'Consumer Reports'.

About 18% of the fish sampled didn't match the names on placards, labels and menus, according to a study by 'Consumer Reports'.


Consumer Reports Friday will reveal a mislabeled seafood scam that leaves millions of consumers clueless whether the fish they think they're buying is the fish they're actually getting.


The world's largest independent product-testing organization Friday will reveal that 22% of the seafood it tested at supermarkets, restaurants, fish markets, gourmet stores and big-box stores in three states was either mislabeled, incompletely labeled or misidentified by store or restaurant employees.


"Consumers are getting ripped off when they buy fish," says Kim Kleman, editor-in-chief of Consumer Reports.


This is no small matter. Americans spent $80.2 billion on seafood last year, up $5 billion from 2009. Mislabeling can be a serious health issue. Some consumers have allergies to specific types of fish, and pregnant women can end up eating fish they shouldn't — with high concentrations of mercury. Others trying to purchase more sustainable fish are being sold cheaper, unsustainable species.


The investigation, which took place in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, included 190 pieces of fresh and frozen seafood that were DNA tested by two outside labs. The findings, in the December issue of Consumer Reports, do not speculate about the reasons for the fraud. Some mislabeling snafus:


•Only four of the 14 different types of fish purchased — Chilean sea bass, coho salmon and bluefin and ahi tuna — were always identified correctly.


•Not one of the 10 lemon soles tested was lemon sole — but more common and cheaper flounder. And of 22 red snapper samples, not one was definitively red snapper, though eight couldn't be ruled out.

•Some 18% of the samples didn't match the names on placards, labels or menus. Another 4% were incompletely labeled or misidentified.


Consumers Union, the public policy division of Consumer Reports, is calling for legislation and standardized seafood labeling.


Officials at the Food and Drug Administration, which oversees food labeling, say they're aware of the problem. "It's illegal to mislabel food," spokesman Doug Karas says. The agency recently supplied six labs with DNA-testing equipment for testing to begin in 2012, he says. But, he adds, "Primarily we look at food safety," not fraud.


But, Kleman says, "I don't think we should have to choose between safety and fraud."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, October 22, 2011

:Original raster version: :Image:Food and Drug...FDA Publishes Report on Factors Potentially Contributing to the Contamination of Fresh, Whole Cantaloupe Implicated in the Multi-State Listeria monocytogenes Foodborne Illness Outbreak


On October 19, 2011, FDA released a document1 which provides an overview of factors that potentially contributed to the contamination of fresh, whole cantaloupe with the pathogen Listeria monocytogenes which was implicated in a multi-state outbreak of listeriosis. In early September 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state health departments, began to investigate a multi-state outbreak of listeriosis. Early in the investigation, cantaloupes from Jensen Farms in the southeast region of Colorado were implicated in the outbreak.


On September 10, 2011, FDA, along with Colorado state officials, conducted an inspection at Jensen Farms and collected multiple samples, including whole cantaloupes and environmental (non-product) samples from within the facility, for laboratory analysis to identify the presence of Listeria monocytogenes. Of the 39 environmental swabs collected from within the facility, 13 were confirmed positive for Listeria monocytogenes with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern combinations that were indistinguishable from three of the four outbreak strains collected from affected patients. Of the 13 positive environmental swabs, 12 were collected at the processing line and 1 was collected from the packing area. Cantaloupe collected from the firm’s cold storage during the inspection was also confirmed positive for Listeria monocytogenes with PFGE pattern combinations that were indistinguishable from two of the four outbreak strains.


FDA Environmental Swabs Positive Results


Processing Line


9 positive samples from the grading belt


Swabs 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30 & 33
2 positive samples from the conveyor


Swabs 20 & 28


1 positive sample from the felt rollers


Swab 13
Packing Area


1 positive sample from the conveyor belt


Swab 34


FDA Product Sample Results


1 Cantaloupe Sample collected from cold storage


5 subs tested positive


(10 whole cantaloupes or “Subs”)


Please refer to the section below for


FDA’s Sample Records and Results on Jensen Farms


As a result of the isolation of outbreak strains of Listeria monocytogenes in the environment of the packing facility and whole cantaloupes collected from cold storage, and the fact that this is the first documented listeriosis outbreak associated with fresh, whole cantaloupe in the United States, FDA initiated an environmental assessment in conjunction with Colorado state and local officials. FDA, state, and local officials conducted the environmental assessment at Jensen Farms on September 22-23, 2011. The environmental assessment was conducted to gather more information to assist FDA in identifying the factors that potentially contributed to the introduction, growth, or spread of the Listeria monocytogenes strains that contaminated the cantaloupe.


FDA identified the following factors as those that most likely contributed to the introduction, spread, and growth of Listeria monocytogenes in the cantaloupes:


Introduction:


There could have been low level sporadic Listeria monocytogenes in the field where the cantaloupe were grown, which could have been introduced into the packing facility.

A truck used to haul culled cantaloupe to a cattle operation was parked adjacent to the packing facility and could have introduced contamination into the facility.

Spread:
The packing facility’s design allowed water to pool on the floor near equipment and employee walkways.


The packing facility floor was constructed in a manner that made it difficult to clean the packing equipment was not easily cleaned and sanitized; washing and drying equipment used for cantaloupe packing was previously used for postharvest handling of another raw agricultural commodity


Growth:
There was no pre-cooling step to remove field heat from the cantaloupes before cold storage. As the cantaloupes cooled there may have been condensation that promoted the growth of Listeria monocytogenes


FDA’s findings regarding this particular outbreak highlight the importance for firms to employ good agricultural and management practices in their packing facilities as well as in growing fields. FDA recommends that firms employ good agricultural and management practices recommended for the growing, harvesting, washing, sorting, packing, storage and transporting of fruits and vegetables sold to consumers in an unprocessed or minimally processed raw form.


FDA has issued a warning letter2 to Jensen Farms based on environmental and cantaloupe samples collected during the inspection. FDA’s investigation at Jensen Farms is still considered an open investigation.
Enhanced by Zemanta